Archive for June 1st, 2011


Jacques Cousteau Clouds

June 1, 2011

Nicknamed “Jacques Cousteau” clouds, these “turbulent” seas in the sky could be examples of the first official new cloud type since 1951

Image Found at Pavan Mickey


Jacques Cousteau Cat

June 1, 2011

Image Credit: the great humongous


The Way of What is to Come

June 1, 2011

Lying alone in your bed
Images from the past filling your head
You try to run, you try to hide
But there is no escape, your eyes are open wide
Long time ago you felt alive
Now only emptiness is blackening your life
The time has come to break away
Or you go astray


Dreamweaver – there is so much more to see
Dreamweaver – There is a deeper way to feel
Dreamweaver – misery takes a hold of you paralyzes your soul
Dreamweaver – find a way to understand
Dreamweaver – You hold your fate in your own hand
Dreamweaver – break your chains and make your move
Or you might just see a dreamweaver’s fall

Page 55 Solar Barge

Things that you started
Are still undone
While you are wasting you precious life
The sleepless nights
Won’t leave you be
You’re going astray

Dreamweaver lyrics by Stratovarius

The Anchorite (an inner, imaginal figure) speaks to Jung: “Surely you know that one can read a book many times – perhaps you almost know it by heart, and nevertheless it can be that, when you look again at the lines before you, certain things appear new or even new thoughts occur to you that you did not have before”.  [Read more Heidekolb’s Blog]



Looking for Lilith

June 1, 2011

Path of Lilith, artist Shane Coppage

So I was doing some writing last night, as I was reading John Sanford’s book “The Invisible Partners: how the male and female in each of us affects our relationships”, and I mused that Lilith is the animus.  Or rather, an exiled fragment of the animus….and that the daimon-lover is Lilith in disguise entering the active imagination to reconcile/redeem the Masculine Wound.

Sounds fanciful?  Well, isn’t the whole mythology surrounding Lilith rather fanciful and embroidered ~ The Alphabet of Ben Sira.  I found this interesting critique by Eliezer Segal over at ucalgary.  

The feminist critique of conventional values has not overlooked the Jewish tradition. Whether or not one acknowledges the validity of all the charges that have been leveled against the treatment of women in Jewish law and theology, it is hardly possible to ignore these issues.

As one who is normally sympathetic with feminist aspirations, I have often been disappointed with the scholarly standards of the debate, especially when it has been directed towards the classical texts of Judaism. In the course of polemical ideological exchanges, I find too frequently that sweeping generalizations are being supported by flimsy or questionable evidence, with a disturbing disregard for factual accuracy and historical context.

As an example of this sort of scholarly sloppiness, I wish to discuss an intriguing Hebrew legend that has found its way into dozens of recent works about Jewish attitudes towards women.

The legend in question was inspired by the Bible’s dual accounts of the creation of the first woman, which led its author to the conclusion that Adam had a firstwife before his marriage to Eve. Adam’s original mate was the demonic Lilith who had been fashioned, just like her male counterpart, from the dust of the earth. Lilith insisted from the outset on equal treatment, a fact which caused constant friction between the couple. Eventually the frustrated Lilith used her magical powers to fly away from her spouse. At Adam’s urging, God dispatched three angels to negotiate her return. When these angels made threats against Lilith’s demonic descendants, she countered that she would prey eternally upon newborn human babies, who could be saved only by invoking the protection of the three angels. In the end Lilith stood her ground and never returned to her husband.

The story implies that when Eve was afterwards fashioned out of Adam’s rib (symbolic of her subjection to him), this was to serve as an antidote to Lilith’s short-lived attempt at egalitarianism. Here, declare the feminists matronizingly, we have a clear statement of the Rabbinic Attitude Towards Women!

There is only one slight problem with this theory: The story of Lilith is not actually found in any authentic Rabbinic tradition. Although it is repeatedly cited as a “Rabbinic legend” or a “midrash,” it is not recorded in any ancient Jewish text!

The tale of Lilith originates in a medieval work called “the Alphabet of Ben-Sira,” a work whose relationship to the conventional streams of Judaism is, to say the least, problematic.

The unknown author of this work has filled it with many elements that seem designed to upset the sensibilities of traditional Jews. In particular, the heroes of the Bible and Talmud are frequently portrayed in the most perverse colours. Thus, the book’s protagonist, Ben-Sira, is said to have issued from an incestuous union between the prophet Jeremiah and his daughter. Joshua is described as a buffoon too fat to ride a horse. King David comes across as a heartless and spiteful figure who secretly delights in the death of his son Absalom, while putting on a disingenuous public display of grief. The book is consistently sounding the praises of hypocritical and insincere behaviour.

So shocking and abhorrent are some of the contents of “the Alphabet of Ben-Sira” that modern scholars have been at a loss to explain why anyone would have written such a book. Some see it as an impious digest of risqué folk-tales. Others have suggested that it was a polemical broadside aimed at Christians, Karaites, or some other opposing movement. I personally would not rule out the possibility that it was actually an anti-Jewish satire–though, to be sure, it did come to be accepted by the Jewish mystics of medieval Germany; and amulets to fend off the vengeful Lilith became an essential protection for newborn infants in many Jewish communities.

Buckle, Oseburg Viking

Eventually the tale of Lilith was included in a popular English-language compendium of Rabbinic legend, and some uncritical readers–unable or unwilling to check after the editor’s sources–cited it as a representative Rabbinic statement on the topic. As tends to happen in such instances, subsequent authors kept copying from one another until the original error turned into an unchallenged historical fact.

Certainly there are volumes of real texts and traditions that could benefit from a searching and critical feminist analysis, and it is a shame to focus so much intellectual energy on a dubious and uncharacteristic legend of this sort.

Lilith Mosaic

 Created by toadranchlady

Why then do we perpetuate the scurrilous rumours  that the Scribe Jesus ben Sirach fashioned about Lilith?  Why have we allowed Sirach to walk through our minds with his dirty feet and teach us his version of the ABCs of Lilith?

The historical Lilith ~ what does that mean exactly?  The historical Lilith as others have written her and perceive her to be; or the historical Lilith in context and relationship to the life we have led, the life we are living, and the life we intend to live.  Astrologically, archetypically, I have put aside the false Lilith humbug , the banality of her evildoing that is no more than the creation of one man’s imagination.

 Lilith casts a spell on mankind?  No, not at all. It was Ben Sirach as a Shadow Scribe who has taken all of us for a ride.